Maximizing the number of acceptable errors in linear regression approximation with deterministic constraints

Sergey Noskov, Vyacheslav Lacviev

Abstract


The paper considers the problem of constructing a linear regression model aimed at maximizing the number of observations for which the approximation error does not exceed a given threshold value. Unlike classical methods that minimize the sum of squares or error modules, the proposed approach allows you to directly control the proportion of acceptable deviations. The problem is formulated in the form of a linear-Boolean programming (LBP) model. In addition to the basic model, six types of deterministic constraints are proposed that reflect a priori expert knowledge about the subject area: interval constraints on parameters, constraints on the sum and maximum of absolute errors, sign compatibility of coefficients, the requirement of accurate hits (the presence of a given number of observations with zero error) and the uniformity of the contribution of features across observations. It is shown that all the introduced restrictions allow linearization, which preserves the belonging of the problem to the LBP class. The statement about the equivalence of the initial and linearized statements is formulated and proved. The proposed approach is used to model the passenger turnover of the Russian Federation's air transport based on statistical data for 2002-2019. A comparative analysis with previously published results shows that the introduction of additional restrictions leads to a tightening of the allowable set of solutions: the number of allowable errors decreases from 11 to 8, however, the sum of error modules decreases from 175.6 to 167.8, which indicates an increase in the accuracy of approximation over the entire set of observations.

Full Text:

PDF (Russian)

References


Draper N., Smith H. Applied Regression Analysis. — 3rd ed. — New York : Wiley, 1998. — 706 p.

Schmidt K. Parameter Estimation in the Linear Regression Model with Prior Information under Inequality Constraints (In German). — Frankfurt am Main : Anton Hain, 1992. — 173 p.

Knopov P.S., Korkhin A.S. Regression Analysis Under A Priori Parameter Restrictions. — New York: Springer, 2012. — 234 p.

Slawski M., Hein M. Sparse recovery by thresholded non-negative least squares // Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 24: 25th Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2011. — P. 1926–1934.

Wu L., Yang Y., Liu H. Nonnegative-lasso and application in index tracking // Computational Statistics & Data Analysis. — 2014. — Vol. 70. — P. 116–126.

Pya N., Wood S.N. Shape constrained additive models // Statistics and Computing. — 2015. — Vol. 25, No 3. — P. 543–559.

Boyd S., Vandenberghe L. Convex Optimization. — Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2004. — 716 p.

Geweke J. Contemporary Bayesian Econometrics and Statistics. — Hoboken, N.J. : John Wiley & Sons, 2005. — 300 p.

Noskov S.I., Shakhurov A.N. Maximizing the number of acceptable approximation errors in constructing a linear regression model // Bulletin of Yugorsky State University. - 2024. — No. 3. — pp. 57-62.

Bertsimas D., King A., Mazumder R. Best subset selection via a modern optimization lens // The Annals of Statistics. — 2016. — Vol. 44, No 2. — P. 813–852.

Noskov S.I. Technology of modeling objects with unstable functioning. Irkutsk, 1996. 320 p.

Noskov S.I., Bychkov Yu.A., Perfilieva K.S. Development of a regression model of passenger turnover of air transport in the Russian Federation using two alternative methods // Bulletin of Cybernetics. – 2023. – № 22 (1). Pp. 36-42.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Abava  Кибербезопасность ИТ-КОНГРЕСС ВМК МГУ 2026 СНЭ

ISSN: 2307-8162