Trends in the Innovationalisation of Law

Mikhail Degtyarev


The article is devoted to the study and interpretation of trends in the Innovationalisation of Law. This is due to the fact that the target interdisciplinarity of many modern technological innovations predetermines the objective need for their succeeding regulatory support and accompaniment, as a consequence - it entails the need to address the question of the future in the field of law. The author refers to the nature and meaning of legal innovations, explains the concept of legal innovations. The author identifies a number of trends in the current (with extrapolation to the subsequent, to the future) development of law, which he associates with innovation. Among them, the author dwells in more detail on the following trends: 1) the trend of progressive increase in the technologization of professional legal activity; 2) the trend of increasing complexity of the ontology of law and regulatory spaces; 3) the trend of ontological simplification of law. According to the author's position, there are many different reasons for the increasing complexity of law and law in general, as well as reasons for the prerequisites of non-linear growth of complexity. The tendency of increasing complexity and entropy (chaotization, confusion, disorderliness) of legislation is due to the very specifics of the phenomenon of law; and objectively, the trends of increasing complexity of regulatory landscapes, regulatory environments cannot but be accompanied and counterbalanced by trends of their forced streamlining and simplification. The author concludes that the predictable future in the sphere of law (achieved by active positive and proactive construction of the legal order and legal space) is not predetermined, its achievement requires the application of certain significant efforts. The article proposes a number of measures that predictively order the described trends.

Full Text:

PDF (Russian)


Urry J. What is the Future? – Malden (MA, USA): Polity Press, 2016. – 226 p.

Elangovan U. Industry 5.0: The Future of the Industrial Economy. – Boca Raton (FL, USA): CRC Press, 2022. – xxi; 127 p.

Massaro A. Electronics in Advanced Research Industries: Industry 4.0 to Industry 5.0 Advances. – Hoboken (NJ, USA): John Wiley & Sons, 2022.

Aristov E.V. Novye reglamentarnye tekhnologii i prochie predvestniki prava budushchego [New regulatory technologies and other harbingers of the law of the future] // Ex jure. – 2022. – № 2. – P. 8–18.

Future Law: Emerging Technology, Regulation and Ethics / Edited by L. Edwards, B. Schafer and E. Harbinja. – Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2020. – xv; 389 p.

Curran L. Better Law for a Better World: New Approaches to Law Practice and Education. – New York: Routledge, 2021. – xxi; 313 с.

Khabrieva T.Y., Chernogor N.N. Budushchee prava. Nasledie akademika V.S. Stepina i iuridicheskaia nauka [The Future of Law. The Legacy of Academician V.S. Stepin and Legal Science]. – Moscow: INFRA-M, 2021. – 176 p.

Majorina M.V. Tsifrovye platformy i mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo, ili est' li budushchee u kiberprava? [Digital Platforms and Private International Law, or Does Cyber Law Have a Future?] // Lex russica. – 2019. – № 2. – P. 107–120.

Ponkin I.V. K voprosu o budushchem prava intellektual'noi sobstvennosti [On the Future of Intellectual Property Law] // Intellektual'naia sobstvennost'. Avtorskoe pravo i smezhnye prava [Intellectual Property. Copyright and related rights]. – 2022. – № 7. – P. 34–41.

Siegel A., Etzkorn I. Kratko. Iasno. Prosto [Briefly. Clearly. Simply]. – Moscow: Olymp-Business, 2015. – xviii; 231 p.

Ponkin I.V., Degtyarev M.V. Pravo nastoiashchego i budushchego: poniatie, funktsional i potentsial smart-kontrakta [The Law of the Present and the Future: the Concept, Functionality and Potential of a Smart-Contract] // Biznes, menedzhment i pravo [Business, Management and Law]. – 2022. – № 3. – P. 22–27.

Degtyarev M.V. Modelirovanie v prave [Modeling in Law]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Juridicheskie nauki [Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences]. – 2021. – № 53. – P. 436–461.

Degtyarev M.V. Prediktivnoe modelirovanie v prave: obraz budushchego zakonodatel'nogo akta [Predictive Modeling in Law: the Image of the Future Legislative Act] // Metodologicheskie problemy tsivilisticheskikh issledovanii (Ezhegodnik) [Methodological problems of the civil law researches (Yearly Periodical Scientific Journal)]. – Perm, 2022. Vol. 4. – P. 163–180.

Degtyarev M.V. Noveishie reguliatornye tekhnologii i instrumenty: Reguliatornye eksperimenty, pesochnitsy, gil'otiny, ekosistemy, platformy [The new regulatory technologies and tools: Regulatory experiments, sandboxes, guillotines, ecosystems, platforms] / Kutafin Moscow State Law University. – Moscow: Buki Vedi, 2022. – 424 p.

Aristov E.V. Paradigma «eksperiment» v zarubezhnykh konstitutsiiakh i v teoreticheskom konstitutsionalizme [The Paradigm of the "Experiment" in Foreign Constitutions and in Theoretical Constitutionalism] // NOMOTHETIKA: Philosophy. Sociology. Law. – 2021. – Vol. 46. – № 3. – P. 499–505.

Kupriyanovsky V.P., Ponkin I.V., Ponkin D.I. Fintech, Regtech i reguliatornye pesochnitsy: poniatie, tsifrovaia ontologiia, perspektivy [Fintech, Regtech and Regulatory Sandboxes: Concept, Digital Ontology, Perspectives] // Sovremennye informacionnye tehnologii i IT-obrazovanie [Modern Information Technologies and IT-Education]. – 2020. – Vol. 16. – № 1. – P. 224–234.

Degtyarev M.V. Kontsept i kompleks instrumentariev «reguliatornaia pesochnitsa» [Concept and set of tools «regulatory sandbox».] // Pravo i gosudarstvo [Law and State (Kazakhstan)]. – 2021. – № 4. – P. 53–70.

Grodzins M. Federal system // .

Cohen J., Grodzins M. How much economic sharing in American federalism? // The American political science review. – 1963. – Vol. LVII. – P. 5–23.

Legal trends report – the top 5 trends expected to impact most legal organizations // . – 14.09.2022.

Morkhat P.M. Pravo i iskusstvennyi intellekt [Law and Artificial Intelligence] / Russian State Academy of Intellectual Property. – Moscow: Unity-Dana, 2018. – 544 p.

Global Atlas of Artificial Intelligence Regulation. Oriental Vector / Ed. by A.V. Neznamov. – Moscow, 2022. – 288 p.

Ponkin I.V., Redkina A.I. Iskusstvennyi intellekt s tochki zreniya prava [Artificial Intelligence from the Point of View of Law]. Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Yuridicheskie nauki [RUDN Journal of Law]. – 2018. – Vol. 22. – № 1. – P. 91–109.

Ponkin I.V. Mashinnaia pravovaia analitika: poniatie, ontologiia, znachenie dlia pravovoi deiatel'nosti [Computational Legal Analytics: concept, ontology, significance for legal activity] // Gosudarstvennaia sluzhba [Public Administration]. – 2022. – Vol. 24. – № 6. – P. 40–46.

Ponkin I.V. Poniatie «analitika» [The concept of «analytics»] // International Journal of Open Information Technologies. – 2019. – Vol. 7. – № 10. – P. 80–90.

Ponkin I.V. Voennaia analitika. Voennoe primenenie iskusstvennogo intellekta i tsifry [Military analytics: Military applications of Artificial Intelligence and digital technologies]. – Moscow: Buki Vedi, 2022. – 106 p.

Ponkin I.V. Ontologii kak instrumentarii prikladnoi analitiki [Ontologies as a Toolkit for Practical Analytics] // International Journal of Open Information Technologies. – 2023. – Vol. 11. – № 2. – P. 77–84.

Ponkin I.V., Redkina A.I. Tsifrovoe gosudarstvennoe upravlenie: metod tsifrovykh modelei-dvoinikov (BIM) v prave [Digital public administration: method of digital models-doubles (bim) in law] // Gosudarstvennaia sluzhba [Public Administration]. – 2020. – Vol. 22. – № 2. – P. 64–69.

Ponkin I.V. Kiber-meta-vselennaia: pravovoi vzgliad [Metaverse: Legal Perspective] // International Journal of Open Information Technologies. – 2023. – Vol. 11. – № 1. – P. 118–127.

Yukhno A.S. Poniatie, osobennosti i perspektivy razvitiia kontseptsii metavselennoi [The Concept, features and Prospects for the Metaverse Construct Development] // Mir novoi ekonomiki [World of the New Economy]. – 2022. – Vol. 16. – № 4. – P. 6–19.

Ponkin I.V. Kontsept mashinochitaemogo i mashinoispolniaemogo prava: aktual'nost', naznachenie, mesto v RegTekhe, soderzhanie, ontologiia i perspektivy [The concept of machine-readable and machine-executable law: relevance, purpose, place in RegTech, content, ontology and prospects] // International Journal of Open Information Technologies. – 2020. – Vol. 8. – № 9. – P. 59–69.

Schuck P.H. Legal Complexity: Some Causes, Consequences, and Cures // Duke Law Journal. – 1992. – Vol. 42. – № 1. – P. 1–52.

When Laws Become Too Complex: A review into the causes of complex legislation. – London: Office of the Parliamentary Counsel, 2013. – 33 p.

Reducing complexity in legislation. Document release 2.1. Reissued June 2016 / Australian Government, Office of Parliamentary Counsel // .

Ponkin I.V., Lapteva A.I. Metodologiia nauchnykh issledovanii i prikladnoi analitiki: Uchebnik [Methodology of Scientific Research and Practical Analytics: A Textbook]. Edition 3. – Moscow: Buki Vedi, 2022. – 754 p. .

Ponkin I.V. Teoriia gosudarstvennogo upravleniia: Uchebnik [Theory of Public Administration: Textbook]. – Moscow: INFRA-M, 2019. – 529 p.

Federal Plain Language Guidelines, March 2011, Revision 1, May 2011 // .

Moukad R. New York's Plain English Law // Fordham Urban Law Journal. – 1980. – Vol. VIII. – № 2. – P. 451–465.

Polnoe sobranie zakonov Rossiiskoi Imperii s 164 goda [Complete Collection of the Laws of the Russian Empire since 164]. Vol. XVIII: 1767–1769. – St. Petersburg, 1830.

Barzun J. Teacher in America. – Indianapolis (Indiana, USA): Liberty Fund, 1981. – xxv; 466 p.

Parting Words: Charles Mingus // . – 27.07.2008.

Warsmann J.-L. Rapport sur la qualité et la simplification du droit // .

Jones R.V. Reflections on Secret Intelligence. – London, Mandarin, 1989.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Abava  Кибербезопасность MoNeTec 2024

ISSN: 2307-8162