Analysis of models and principles of the system modeling in the construction of predictive models of cargo loading

E. Malovetskaya, A. Kozlovskiy

Abstract


The study of intra-annual dynamics of generalized indicators of railway production activity is an essential part of long-term forecasting, planning and analysis. The development of indicators of uneven operation of the car fleet is one of the important issues of solving the General problem of increasing the rhythmicity of operational work of railway transport. In the evaluation of seasonal variations of transport using conventional methods causes a significant error. As one of the ways to solve this problem, the authors propose an improved methodological tool for assessing the seasonal unevenness of cargo loading to the ports of the Far East. This method is based on the construction of a mathematical model of cargo loading, on the basis of which loading is predicted for the upcoming year. In the form of the completed work, the principles of mathematical modeling and methods of mathematical research, as well as the application of a systematic approach to solving the problem of predicting the volume of car traffic are considered. By means of scenario planning and expert forecasting, the results were adjusted and the conclusion was made about the need to develop throughput capacities in the busiest sections of the BAM and TRANS-Siberian railway. A comparison of the actual loading volumes with the forecast values showed that the presented forecast was justified. Deviations of forecast values from real ones are within acceptable limits. The proposed tools can significantly increase the accuracy of estimating seasonal unevenness of cargo loading and forecast the arrival of car traffic to seaports. All this will contribute to improve the quality of planning and analysis of the functioning and development of railways. The full range of measures includes the construction of process models of the production unit of the Russian Railways holding and the preparation of a forecast model of production activity, and can also contribute to the creation of an innovative system of operational indicators of polygons.

Full Text:

PDF (Russian)

References


Babina O. I. "Comparative analysis of simulation and analytical models," Simulation modeling. Theory and practice. St. Petersburg: Center for Shipbuilding and Ship Repair Technology (St. Petersburg), 2009, pp. 73 - 77.

Burda A. G., Burda G. P. Economic and mathematical methods and models. Kuban. State agrarian. un-t. Krasnodar, 2015. 178 p.

Volokobinsky M. Yu., Pekarskaya O. A., Razi D. A. "Decision-making based on the method of analysis of hierarchies," Bulletin of the Financial University, 2016, No. 2 (92), pp. 33 - 42.

Volkova V.N., Chernenkaya L.V., Mager V.E. "Classification of models in system analysis," Scientific and technical statements of St. Petersburg State Polytechnic University. Computer science. Telecommunications. Management, 2013, No. 3 (174), pp. 33 - 43.

Report of O.V. Belozerov, General Director - Chairman of the Board of the open joint-stock company Russian Railways, at the expanded final meeting of the Board of Russian Railways//Railway Transport. - 2018. - No. 1. - S. 4-10.

Zvyagin L.S. Application of systems-analytical methods in the field of expert forecasting//Economics and management: problems, solutions. 2017. T. 3. NO. 6. pp. 145-148.

Malovetskaya E.V. Relevance of the application of simulation modeling in calculating the train formation plan taking into account the development of landfill technologies//Journal "T-Comm - Telecommunications and Transport" No. 4, 2019 г. ISSN 2072-8735 (Print) ISSN 2072-8743 (Online) DOI 10.24411/2072-8735-2018-10261

http://media-publisher.ru/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Nom-4-2019-sait.pdf

Malovetskaya E V Modeling of process of forming of group trains upon transition to tough strings of the schedule. – Modern technologies. Systems analysis. Modeling. 2017 No. 1 (53), pp. 184-188.

Macheret D. A., Ledney A. Yu. Traffic volumes the key factor in the efficiency of use and development of transport infrastructure. Railway Economy, 2019, no. 4, pp. 28-38.

Nabatova D. S. Mathematical and instrumental methods of decision support. M.: Publishing House Yurite, 2019, 292 p.

Pogozhich N. I., Sofronova M. S., Panasenko D. P. "A way of transforming many possible decisions in decision theory," ScienceRise, 2017, No. 1 (41), pp. 77 - 81.

Samotina S. A., Potapova E. V. "Making managerial decisions in conditions of uncertainty," Innovative economics: information, analytics, forecasts, 2011, No. 1, S. 3-4Zvyagin L. S. “Sistemnyy analiz i postroyeniye modeley” [System analysis and model building], Aktual'nyye problemy gumanitarnykh i yestestvennykh nauk, 2014. no10. pp. 146-150.

Sinchukov A.V. "Modern Classification of Mathematical Models," Innovative Science, 2016, No. 3-1, pp. 214 – 215.

Sotnikov, E.A., Schoenfeld, K.P. Uneven freight transportation in modern conditions and its impact on the required throughput of sections/E.A. Sotnikov, K.P. Schoenfeld//Bulletin VNIIZHT. - 2011. - No. 5. - S. 3-9. - ISSN - 2223-9731.

Spiridonova E.V. PEST - analysis as the main tool for the analysis of factors of the distant environment//Modern scientific research and innovation, 2017, No. 3.

Sharov V.A. New risks in the implementation of a single integrated planning for public rail transport//Transport science and technology, 2016, No. 2 pp. 87-93.

Grigoroudis E., Orfanoudaki E., Zopounidis C. “Strategic performance measurement in a healthcare organisation: A multiple criteria approach based on balanced scorecard”, Omega, 2012, №40 (1), pp. 104-119.

Malovetskaya E.V., Bolshakov R.S., Dimov A.V., Byshlyago A.A. “Planning of qualitative indexes of railroad operational work in polygon technologies” et al 2020 IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 760 012041

Sehra S. K., Brar D., Singh Y., Kaur D. “Multi criteria decision making approach for selecting effort estimation model”, arXiv preprint arXiv:1310.5220, 2013.

Sevcenko G. Statybos investicimq sprendimц rizikos valdymas: Diss. VGTU leidykla “Technika”, 2015, 186 p.

Valiris G., Chytas P., Glykas M.”Making decisions using the balanced scorecard and the simple multi-attribute rating technigue”, Performance Measurement and Metric, 2005.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Abava  Кибербезопасность MoNeTec 2024

ISSN: 2307-8162